¶1concurring and dissenting.
¶2I dissent to the majority opinion as it respects Issue (4) for the reason expressed in Durham v. State, (1984), Ind., 464 N.E.2d 321, 326. (Prentice, J., dissenting).
¶3In all other respects, I concur.
468 N.E.2d 845
Asbell v. State
Decided October 2, 1984
Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1984-10-02
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1990
7 state decisions
Relies on Durham v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1984-10-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →