IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ROBERT CRUISE, No. 81464
Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Respondent.
FILED
AUG 0 7 2020
EUTASETH A. !AMR
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
By 'c •Vr
DEPUTY%-aLIZIZt
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se notice of appeal from district court orders
denying a presentence motion to dismiss counsel and appoint alternate
counsel and denying a presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea.
Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mary Kay Holthus, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal reveals jurisdictional defects.
First, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying
a presentence motion to dismiss counsel and appoint alternate counsel.
Castillo v. State,
(1990). Second, an order
denying a presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea is not a final
appealable order; the decision may be challenged on appeal from the
o -‘91/(77
judgment of conviction. NRS 177.015(3); NRS 177.045; Hargrove v. State,
(1984). Accordingly, this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1
Parraguirre
I , J.
Hardesty Cadish
cc: Hon. Mary Kay Holthus, District Judge
Robert Cruise
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
'Given this order, no action will be taken on the pro se motion filed on
July 22, 2020.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
ICI) 1947A 44011. 2
