468 So. 2d 1018 - Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 1987
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Weaver v. Graham · Carter v. State · 397 So. 2d 663 - State v. Williams · 463 So. 2d 458 - Frazier v. State · Arnold v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sentence under the guidelines in effect at the time of the offense. Next, Moore argues the trial court should not have assessed points for victim injury because the offense for which he was sentenced may be committed without victim contact. While this latter contention is true, the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] rule change that has a disadvantageous effect on an offender does not apply to crimes committed before the effective date of the rule change.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the same sentence is possible if clear and convincing reasons for departure from the then applicable guidelines are stated in writing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Florida
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.