Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

468 So. 2d 1022

468 So.2d 1022

10 Fla.L.Weekly 1028

Harp v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-04-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1985

1 state decisions

Relies on 437 So. 2d 1057 - Bell v. State · Snowden v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-04-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HERSEY, Judge.

¶1The conviction and sentence for felony murder is affirmed. The conviction of robbery, the underlying felony, cannot stand: Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983); Snowden v. State, 449 So.2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), and is therefore reversed.

¶2As to appellant’s additional points on appeal, we find either that they are without merit or that they were not properly preserved for appeal.

HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

¶3BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

¶4ORDERED that Appellee’s May 9, 1985 Motion for Rehearing and for Stay of Mandate is granted only as to the stay of mandate. Counsel for Appellee shall advise this Court upon disposition of the case of State of Florida v. Snowden.

/468/so2d/1022 · .json · Public domain