Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

468 So. 2d 1036

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-05-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2014

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-05-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed.

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.ANSTEAD, C.J., specially concurs with opinion.
ANSTEAD, Chief Judge,

¶2specially concurring.

¶3I concur in my colleagues’ decision to uphold the trial court’s ruling on appellant’s motion to suppress because of the legal requirement imposed upon this reviewing court to uphold the trial court’s ruling where there exists competent substantial evidence in support thereof. That the trial court took a different view than the one which might seem most reasonable to us is not a valid basis for reversal.

/468/so2d/1036 · .json · Public domain