Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 468 So. 2d 1176 - Cahn v. Cahn

468 So. 2d 1176 - Cahn v. Cahn’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2015

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

801985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc. · 360 So. 2d 1331 - Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. · Juneau v. Laborde · General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo · 289 So. 2d 116 - Edmonston v. A-Second Mortgage Co. of Slidell, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “can prescribe only for the future, it can have no retrospective operation ...”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Art. 543. Partition of the property in kind or by licitation When property is held in indivisión, a person having a share in full ownership may demand partition of the property in kind or by licitation, even though there may be other shares in naked ownership and usufruct. A person having a share in naked ownership only or in usufruct only does not have this right, unless a naked owner of an undivided share and a usufructuary of that share jointly demand partition in kind or by licitation, in which event their combined shares shall be deemed to constitute a share in full ownership. Amended by Acts 1983, No. 535, § 1.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.