Gladbach v. Sparks’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Calder v. Jones · Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco · Southern Machine Co. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘ “(1) The nonresident must purposefully avail himself of the privilege of doing some act or consummating some transaction with or in the forum.... A single event may be a sufficient basis if its effects within the forum are substantial enough to qualify under rule 2 [below]; “ ‘ “(2) the plaintiff must have a legal cause of action against the nonresident which arises out of, or results from, the activity or activities of the defendant within the forum; and “ ‘ “(3) If (and only if) the requirements of Rule 1 and 2 [above] are established, a “minimum contact” between the nonresident and the forum exists; that assumption of jurisdiction must be found to be consonant with the due process notions of “fair play” and “substantial justice.” ’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Under Rule 4.2(a), A.R.Civ.P., jurisdiction over a nonresident may be acquired in any action if “ ‘[t]he person has sufficient contacts with this state, as set forth in subdivision (a)(2) of this rule, so that the prosecution of the action against the person in this state is not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or the Constitution of the United States.... ’ “Subdivision (a)(2) provides: “ ‘A person has sufficient contacts with the state when that person, acting directly or by agent, is or may be legally responsible as a consequence of that person’s: “ ‘(A) Transacting business in this state; ’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.