468 So. 2d 207 - Bates v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2013
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Ford · Stoner v. California · 73 Cal. App. 13 - People v. Black · 266 Cal. App. 2d 426 - People v. Harris · 428 So. 2d 197 - Wilson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A person commits the crime of burglary in the first degree if he knowingly and unlawfully enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling with intent to commit a crime therein, and, if, in effecting entry or while in dwelling or in immediate flight therefrom, he or another participant in the crime: "(1) Is armed with explosives or a deadly weapon; or "(2) Causes physical injury to any person who is not a participant in the crime; or "(3) Uses or threatens the immediate use of a dangerous instrument."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pardue v. State“'A motion for a mistrial should not be granted when the prejudicial qualities of a comment can be eradicated by action of the trial court.' Mallory v. State , 437 So.2d 595 , 599 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), cert. denied , 464 U.S. 1047 , 104 S.Ct. 722 , 79 L.Ed. 184 (1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that in order to commit the crime of burglary in the second degree when the accused is 'armed with . . . a deadly weapon,' the deadly weapon need not be used, threatened, or displayed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.