468 So. 2d 378 - Bradley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 1996
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 458 So. 2d 42 - Davis v. State · 458 So. 2d 10 - Mitchell v. State · 455 So. 2d 535 - Moore v. State · Mincey v. State · 464 So. 2d 172 - Carter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e hesitate to affirm a lengthy sentence which the trial court may not have imposed had it known the defendant would not be eligible for parole.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“WHEN A DEFENDANT WHO COMMITTED A CRIME BEFORE OCTOBER 1, 1983 AFFIRMATIVELY SELECTS SENTENCING PURSUANT TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES, MUST THE RECORD SHOW THE DEFENDANT KNOWINGLY AND INTELLIGENTLY WAIVED THE RIGHT TO PAROLE ELIGIBILITY?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.