¶1We affirm appellant’s conviction but vacate his sentence and remand this cause for resentencing with directions that any re-sentencing be in accord with the sentencing guidelines or that separate written findings be entered if the sentence deviates from the guidelines. See Boynton v. State, 10 F.L.W. 795 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 27, 1985). The trial court is also cautioned that it is not proper to retain jurisdiction over a sentence imposed pursuant to the guidelines. See Hawkins v. State, 463 So.2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Knight v. State, 455 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
468 So. 2d 406
468 So.2d 406
10 Fla.L.Weekly 1028
Hill v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 24, 1985
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-04-24
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1986
1 state decisions
Relies on 455 So. 2d 457 - Knight v. State · 463 So. 2d 480 - Hawkins v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1985-04-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →