Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

468 So. 2d 442

468 So.2d 442

10 Fla.L.Weekly 1113

Dolan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-05-03

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1990

3 state decisions

Relies on 400 So. 2d 791 - Goodson v. State · 452 So. 2d 1041 - Harris v. State · Turner v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-05-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, the trial court’s Amendment to Judgment which orders appellant to pay $1,500 in restitution pursuant to section 775.089(1), Florida Statutes (1981), is stricken since the trial court failed to consider the appellant’s ability to *443pay, his financial resources, or the burden that payment would impose upon him. See Harris v. State, 452 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Turner v. State, 431 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Subject to the notice requirements of Goodson v. State, 400 So.2d 791 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), the court may reimpose restitution pursuant to the mandates of the statute.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and FRANK, JJ., concur.
/468/so2d/442 · .json · Public domain