Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 468 So. 2d 447 - Williams v. State

468 So. 2d 447 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2015

8 state decisions

401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rutledge v. Florida · 332 So. 2d 615 - Jones v. State · 453 So. 2d 1355 - US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Dept. of Ins. · 374 So. 2d 944 - Holmes v. State · Baeumel v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n passing on a motion for judgment of acquittal where a defendant has asserted an affirmative defense, “the proper test is to determine, first, whether the defendant produced competent evidence of an affirmative defense and, second, whether the state has carried its burden of contradicting that evidence to the extent that a jury issue is made.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whether, in a prosecution for unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under section 790.23, Florida Statutes, prejudicial error results when the type of the prior conviction as well as the fact of such conviction is admitted into evidence in order to establish defendant's status as a convicted felon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.