Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

468 So. 2d 470

468 So.2d 470

10 Fla.L.Weekly 1151

Docket No. 84-2017.

Hayes v. State

Robert Howard HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-05-08

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1990

7 state decisions

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Tucker · 336 So. 2d 1244 - Hicks v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-05-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*471 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert S. Jaegers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3BARKETT, Judge.

¶4We affirm appellant's conviction but vacate the sentence imposed.

¶5At sentencing, appellant elected to be sentenced outside the guidelines because the sentencing judge told him his prior uncounseled convictions would be scored as prior convictions in calculating his sentence under the guidelines. This was error. Convictions obtained without counsel when the defendant could not afford counsel and did not waive his right to counsel are constitutionally invalid under Gideon v. Wainwright,372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). Such uncounseled convictions may not be used to determine a defendant's sentence. United States v. Tucker,404 U.S. 443, 92 S.Ct. 589, 30 L.Ed.2d 592 (1972). See Glenn v. State,338 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Hicks v. State,336 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

¶6We remand for resentencing so that appellant may choose between a properly computed guidelines sentence and a preguidelines sentence determined without consideration of the prior uncounseled convictions.

¶7LETTS and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

/468/so2d/470 · .json · Public domain