468 So. 2d 617 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2003
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Wong Sun v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Leon · Carroll v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It logically follows that once police authorities have actual knowledge of a fact (here the invalidity of the warrant which the ... Sheriff's Office must be charged with because of the information on file in its records department), all successive officers who dealt with defendant are held to have knowledge of this fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ott v. State“I, Betty Sue Taylor, having been informed of my constitutional right not to have a search made of the premises ... without a search warrant and of my absolute right to refuse to consent to such a search....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“1) There must be probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime, and 2) There must be exigent circumstances requiring an immediate search.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.