Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 468 So. 2d 889 - Ex Parte James

468 So. 2d 889 - Ex Parte James’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2015

7 state decisions

301984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Howell v. State · 468 So. 2d 887 - James v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[The] [d]efendant's statement, made under the instant circumstances, is not reasonably susceptible of an inference that [d]efendant or his companion committed an attempted theft. . . . [I]t appears that no property was touched, that the defendant did not attempt to touch any, and that defendant did not ask for, or even remotely allude to, any property. While the evidence is sufficient to establish the element of threat, it is insufficient to establish that [d]efendant's words or actions were directed toward obtaining or exerting unauthorized control of any property. 3”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “See that black guy over there at the register . . . well, he has got a gun and do as he says and not start no shit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “stood around for a minute and then left the store.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.