Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 468 SW2D 171 - Fuller v. Flanagan

Fuller v. Flanagan’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2002

14 state decisions

501971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re King's Estate · Burt v. Lochausen · Biggers v. Continental Bus System, Inc. · De Winne v. Allen · Bonney v. San Antonio Transit Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The weight of authority in the United States follows the rule that although an infant is liable for torts that he directly commits, the negligence of the infant’s alleged servant or agent cannot be imputed to the minor under the doctrine of respondeat superior. * * * ⅜ ⅜ ⅛ # * * “The ‘joint enterprise’ doctrine is founded on principles of agency [citation omitted]. Because this is true, the rule forbidding the imputing of negligence of the alleged agent to the minor would also apply to cases where the minor is engaged in a joint enterprise with the person who commits the negligent act in question.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.