Russell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 1988
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hinkle v. State · Smith v. State · Bennett v. State · Spencer v. State · Korb v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘It is a long established rule that an objection to admission of evidence must be specific and must state the grounds of the objection or the same will not be considered. It is also a well settled rule that an objection that the evidence is irrelevant, immaterial and incompetent is but a general objection which is like no objection at all.’ ” Russell v. State, 468 S.W.2d 373 (Tex.Cr.App.1971).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Holmes v. State · Howard v. State““. . . Appellant’s objection that the proper predicate had not been laid for the introduction of the pistol into evidence is also too general an objection to merit consideration.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Berry v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.