Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 468 U.S. 1032 - Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

2,331
cited by 2,331 later decisions
32
cited 32 times by the Supreme Court
41
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

924 federal appellate · 149 district · 394 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,331 later decisions (32 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably United States v. Leon (1984), Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr (2001)

924 federal appellate · 149 district · 394 state decisions — followed in 41 states

766019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1302 (§ 262 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1325 (§ 275 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1361 (§ 291 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Leon · Gerstein v. Pugh · Stone v. Powell · United States v. Calandra

Cited together with United States v. Janis · United States v. Calandra · United States v. Leon · Wong Sun v. United States · Terry v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,331 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “intended to provide a streamlined determination of eligibility to remain in this country, nothing more.”
    67 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “egregious violations of Fourth Amendment or other liberties that might transgress notions of fundamental fairness and undermine the probative value of the evidence obtained.”
    25 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “various protections that apply in the context of a criminal trial do not apply in a deportation hearing.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.