California v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 1995
most recently cited
9 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Duren v. Missouri · 36 Cal. 3d 36 - People v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether this sort of jury selection procedure can be described as “systematically” excluding classes that do not register to vote in proportion to their numbers, and whether the need for efficient jury selection may not justify resort to such neutral lists as voter registration rolls even though they do not perfectly reflect population, see 439 U.S. at 368-370 [99 S.Ct. at 670-72], are by no means open and shut questions under Duren. (Italics added).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“grantfed] a stay, because I think four Members of our Court would probably vote to grant certiorari to review the issue,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.