Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 468 U.S. 137 - Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

522
cited by 522 later decisions
14
cited 14 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

185 federal appellate · 58 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 522 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2023 · most notably Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth (1985), Reves v. Ernst & Young (1990)

185 federal appellate · 58 district · 22 state decisions

282019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1818 · 12 U.S.C. § 24 · 12 U.S.C. § 248 (§ 11 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913) · 12 U.S.C. § 335 (§ 9 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913) · 12 U.S.C. § 377 · 12 U.S.C. § 378 · 12 U.S.C. § 84 · 12 U.S.C. § 93A

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · Russello v. United States · United States v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 522 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “deference is not to be a device that emasculates the significance of judicial review.”
    28 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Securities Industry Association v. Robert L. Clarke and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency v. Security Pacific National Bank, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant · Greenville Hospital System v. Heckler
  2. “it shall be unlawful— (1) For any person, firm, ... or other similar organization, engaged in the business of issuing, underwriting, selling, or distributing, ... securities, to engage at the same time to any extent whatever in the business of receiving deposits....”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System · Securities Industry Association v. Robert L. Clarke and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency v. Security Pacific National Bank, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant
  3. “post hoc rationalizations by counsel for agency action are entitled to little deference”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Huntington Branch, National Association For The Advancement Of Colored People v. The Town Of Huntington · Population Institute, Population Council v. M. Peter McPherson Administrator Population Institute, William S. Green v. M. Peter McPherson Administrator

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.