Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 468 U.S. 183 - Davis v. Scherer

Davis v. Scherer’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

4,538
cited by 4,538 later decisions
50
cited 50 times by the Supreme Court
40
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

1,363 federal appellate · 820 district · 298 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4,538 later decisions (50 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Anderson v. Creighton (1987), Mitchell v. Forsyth (1985)

1,363 federal appellate · 820 district · 298 state decisions — followed in 40 states

1.4k019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Cited together with Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Malley v. Briggs · Scheuer v. Rhodes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4,538 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    182 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “objective reasonableness of [his] conduct as measured by reference to clearly established law.”
    41 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A plaintiff who seeks damages for violation of constitutional or statutory rights may overcome the defendant official's qualified immunity only by showing that those rights were clearly established at the time of the conduct at issue.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.