Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 468 U.S. 576 - Block v. Rutherford

Block v. Rutherford’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

1,210
cited by 1,210 later decisions
33
cited 33 times by the Supreme Court
26
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

467 federal appellate · 125 district · 126 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,210 later decisions (33 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2025 · most notably Hudson v. Palmer (1984), Turner v. Safley (1987)

467 federal appellate · 125 district · 126 state decisions — followed in 26 states

384019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedRutherford v. Pitchess (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Wolff v. McDonnell · Bell v. Wolfish · Santosky v. Kramer · Parratt v. Taylor

Cited together with Bell v. Wolfish · Turner v. Safley · Pell v. Procunier · Hudson v. Palmer · Wolff v. McDonnell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,210 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the absence of substantial evidence in the record to indicate that the officials have exaggerated their response to these considerations.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Any inquiry into the constitutionality of security measures employed in a penal institution must begin with the premise that “prison administrators should be accorded wide-ranging deference in the adoption and execution of policies and practices that in their judgment are needed to preserve internal order and discipline and to maintain institutional security.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “further balancing resulted in an impermissible substitution of its views on the proper administration of Central Jail for that of the experienced administrators of that facility”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.