Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

469 F.2d 337

Docket No. 72-1783.

United States v. Oliverez

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 3, 1972.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-10-03

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1982

3 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Thoresen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1972-10-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Kevin J. Mclnerney (argued), of Mc-Inerney, Milchen & Frank, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

¶2E. Mac Amos, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Stephen G. Nelson, R. Michael Bruney, Thomas M. Coffin, Asst. U. S.

¶3Attys., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶4Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.*

¶6PER CURIAM:

¶7The appellant was convicted, upon ample evidence, of smuggling marihuana into the United States from Mexico.

¶8The only issue on appeal is the claim of error in the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment bel cause the grand jury proceedings had not been recorded. The point was explored and decided adversely to appellant in United States v. Thoresen (9th Cir. 1970) 428 F.2d 654, to which we adhere.

/469/f2d/337 · .json · Public domain