Hood v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
469 F.2d 721 · 1972
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 1999
most recently cited
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Furman v. Georgia · United States v. Tucker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. 443 , 447, 92 S.Ct. 589 , 591, 30 L.Ed.2d 592 (1972) the Supreme Court observed: 1 * * * that a sentence imposed by a federal district judge, if within statutory limits, is generally not subject to review.’ We fail to find any abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in denying the motion to modify or set aside the sentence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.