United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
469 F.2d 788 · 1972
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2000 · most notably United States v. Studivant (1976), Heusle v. National Mutual Insurance (1980)
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 33 U.S.C. § 409 · 42 U.S.C. § 2651
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States · United States v. Standard Oil Co. · Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United States · Sunal v. Large
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In any case in which the United States is authorized or required by law to furnish hospital, medical, surgical, or dental care and treatment (including prostheses and medical appliances) to a person who is injured or suffers a disease, after the effective date of this Act, under circumstances creating a tort liability upon some third person ... to pay damages therefor, the United States shall have a right to recover from said third person the reasonable value of the care and treatment so furnished or to be furnished and shall, as to this right be subrogated to any right or claim that the injured .' . . person . . . has against such third person to the extent of the reasonable value of the care and treatment so furnished. . . . ””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.