Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 469 F.3d 692 - Blevens v. Holcomb

Blevens v. Holcomb’s Empirical Analysis

469 F.3d 692 · 2006

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
August 2010
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Krause v. US Truck Co., Inc. · Swope v. Printz · Hart v. Steele · Ladish v. Gordon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To establish a claim for negligence under Missouri law, the plaintiff must prove: (1) the existence of a duty on the part of the defendant to protect the plaintiff from injury, (2) a failure of the defendant to perform that duty, and (3) an injury proximately caused by the defendant's failure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.