Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 469 FSUPP2D 425 - DIRECTV, INC. v. Treesh

DIRECTV, INC. v. Treesh’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 152

Relies on Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Maryland v. Louisiana · Exxon Corporation v. Governor of Maryland Shell Oil Company · Hughes v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “owed not to the geographic location of the companies, but to their different delivery mechanisms”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.