Butrum v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2005
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kennedy v. State · Terry v. State · Phelan v. State · Humes v. State · Marsh v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The trial judge was correct, in his ruling in the case at bar, that it is not intoxication that is a defense, but rather that intoxication may be considered as would any other mental incapacity of such severe degree that it would preclude the ability to form intent."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"We held in [Harmer] that the act of escape was an act separate and unrelated to the acts which constituted the offense for which [the defendant] had been incarcerated originally." 469 N.E.2d at 1178 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. State“whether or not appellant's intoxication was sufficient to deprive him of the ability to form the necessary intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gibson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.