Harrison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2016
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Disbarment of Goldman · Fitzgerald v. Virginia · Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth · COMBS, AUDITOR v. Cook · Collins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of a charge under the section of the statute regarding the possession of paraphernalia used to introduce a controlled substance into the body, it actually charged the defendant with possession as enhancing the effect of a controlled substance under another subsection of the statute. Id. As a result, we reversed the defendant's convietion because the State failed to produce any evidence on the element of enhancement that was charged under that particular section of the statute. Id. at 26-27 . We note that just as in Harrison, the State had the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Atkinson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.