Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

469 P.3d 186

Rogoff Vs. Marsh

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 2020

Nevada Supreme Court · decided 2020-08-14

Relies on TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

Decided 2020-08-14

           IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA


 MARLENE ROGOFF, AN INDIVIDUAL,                           No. 81615
                  Appellant,

JAMES MARSH,
                     VS.
                                                             RILED
                           Respondent.




                       ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

              This is a pro se appeal from an order revising vexatious litigant
restrictions in a previous order. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark
County; Trevor L. Atkin, Judge.
              Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to
NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated
in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b).
This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is
authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 
100 Nev. 207
, 
678 P.2d 1152
 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an
appeal from an order designating a party a vexatious litigant or revising
those restrictions. This court lacks jurisdiction and
              ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.




      Al4"
                            ,J
Stiglich                                    Silver



                                                               20 - 3o1S-2._
                cc:   Hon. Trevor L. Atkin, District Judge
                      Marlene Rogoff
                      The Galliher Law Firm
                      Eighth District Court Clerk




SUPREME COURT
          OF
      NEVADA


( 01 19.17A                                         2

/469/p3d/186 · .json · Public domain