Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 469 P.3d 648 - State v. Moore

State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2020

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Davis v. United States · McNeil v. Wisconsin · State v. Ward · State v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the suspect 'must articulate his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly that [an objectively] reasonable 22 police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement to be a request for an attorney'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the request must be for assistance with the custodial interrogation, not for subsequent hearings or proceedings. '”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Premeditation means to have thought the matter over beforehand, in other words, to have formed the design or intent to kill before the act. Although there is no specific time period required for premeditation, the concept of premeditation requires more than the instantaneous, intentional act of taking another's life. [Citation omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.