State v. Robison’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Alleyne v. United States · Washington v. Recuenco · Oregon v. Ice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After considering the evidence and the arguments of counsel, the district court found that the medical bills incurred by Corporal Cutright were caused by Robison's crime and that Lyon County's insurance carrier had paid the medical expenses on the officer's behalf. Accordingly, the district court ordered Robison to pay restitution in the amount of $2,648.56 to reimburse the workers compensation insurance carrier for the medical expenses it had paid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.