469 So. 2d 1 - Long v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1986
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Hasting · 443 So. 2d 955 - State v. Murray · Russ v. State · 369 So. 2d 943 - David v. State · 468 So. 2d 908 - Ed Ricke & Sons v. Green by and Through Swan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“HAS THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, BY ITS AGREEMENT IN STATE V. MURRAY, 443 So.2d 955 (Fla. 1984) WITH THE ANALYSIS OF THE SUPERVISORY POWERS OF APPELLATE COURTS AS RELATED TO THE HARMLESS ERROR RULE AS SET FORTH IN UNITED STATES V. HASTING, 461 U.S. 499 , 103 S.Ct. 1974 , 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983), RECEDED BY IMPLICATION FROM THE PER SE RULE OF REVERSAL OF DAVID V. STATE, 369 So.2d 943 (Fla. 1979) and TRAFFICANTE V. STATE, 92 So.2d 811 (Fla. 1957), WHERE THE PROSECUTOR COMMENTS ON DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the evidence in this case was sufficient, in our opinion, to overcome the error so we affirm the conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.