Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 469 SO2D 1219 - Cheatham v. Morrison, Inc.

Cheatham v. Morrison, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2014

11 state decisions

401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc. · 363 So. 2d 419 - Bolden v. Georgia Cas. & Sur. Co. · 446 So. 2d 1352 - Mix v. Mougeot · 424 So. 2d 446 - Beverly v. State Through Dept. of Health · 353 So. 2d 424 - Peck v. Orleans Levee Bd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The basic test is whether the wages paid subsequent to the injury were actually earned. The mere fact that the duties before and after the accident were similar or dissimilar, heavier or lighter, is relevant but not determinative of the issue. And whether the wages were actually earned is determined by the facts and circumstances of each particular case." Peck v. Orleans Levee Board, 353 So.2d 424, 426 (La.App. 4th Cir.1977); writ denied, 355 So.2d 259 (La.1978). Plaintiff admitted that although her doctor discharged her for light duty, she performed the same work as before and that she actually worked for the paycheck she received. Therefore, she did not receive wages in lieu of compensation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Our courts emphasize encouraging rather than penalizing an employee who continues to work despite an injury that, in legal contemplation, proves to be a disability. Plaintiff may or may not have been able to perform either light or regular duty after first reporting back to work, but her legal disability was not manifest until June 13, 1978, when her employer found her work too slow as a direct result of her work-related injury. (Citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.