469 So. 2d 1308 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Sims · 401 So. 2d 266 - Palmer v. State · 44 Ala. App. 673 - Segrest v. State · 444 So. 2d 905 - Kendrick v. State · Stonoker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his court has held on many occasions that in order for intoxication to render a confession inadmissible, it must amount to a `mania' which impairs the will and mind to the extent that the person confessing is unconscious of the meaning of his words, [a] lesser state of intoxication will not render a confession inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The test to determine the admissibility of a confession is a two-part inquiry: first, the court must consider whether the government complied with the Mi randa requirements, and, second, the court must then rule on the issue of the confession’s voluntariness.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sanderson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.