Steib v. Steib’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1999
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 216 So. 2d 391 - Smith v. Smith · 362 So. 2d 568 - LeBlanc v. LeBlanc · 451 So. 2d 1336 - Jergins v. Jergins · Brister v. Brister
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... The fault alluded to in La.C.C. art. 160 has been interpreted by this court to be misconduct of a serious nature which is an independent contributory cause of the dissolution of the marriage_ Although fault is not an issue to be determined in a divorce under La.R.S. 9:301, fault becomes an issue where one of the spouses claims permanent alimony. The La.C.C. art. 160 fault preclusion to permanent alimony applies where a spouse claims permanent alimony in divorce proceedings under La.R.S. 9:301. LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, 362 So.2d 568 (La.1978); Brister v. Brister, 402 So.2d 173 (La. App. 1st Cir.1981).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilcox v. Bonura
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.