Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 469 So. 2d 690 - Crook v. State

469 So. 2d 690 - Crook v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 1991
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers · 40 Ala. App. 45 - Orr v. State · Yelton v. State · 49 Ala. App. 359 - Bryant v. State · 448 So. 2d 435 - Wysinger v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[E]ven a prosecutor's repeated references to evidence ruled inadmissible may not constitute reversible error if the trial court takes sufficient curative action. . . . " 'Generally, timely corrective action by the [trial] court . . . is sufficient to cure the error resulting from improper conduct or remarks of counsel, unless such conduct or remarks are so prejudicial that they are obviously not cured, or unless the court's action is insufficient for such purpose." ' "”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[E]ven a prosecutor's repeated references to evidence ruled inadmissible may not constitute reversible error if the trial court takes sufficient curative action. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'. . . In determining whether an accused was prejudiced by prosecutorial misconduct, this court”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.