Vick v. Albert’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“application of the discount[ ] ... would deprive plaintiffs of the value of the decedent's proportionate interest in a going concern, since they would not receive what they would have received had the entire entity been sold on the open market unaffected by a diminution in value as a result of a forced sale”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Congel v. Malfitano“undermine the remedial goal of the appraisal statutes to protect shareholders from being forced to sell at unfair values,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Congel v. Malfitano
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.