47 Ala. App. 136 - Baldwin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 455 So. 2d 137 - Free v. State (1984), 539 So. 2d 436 - Connolly v. State (1988)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Ashe v. Swenson · Benton v. Maryland · Gunter v. State · Hall v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Any act or omission declared criminal and punishable in different ways by different provisions of law shall be punished only under one of such provisions and a conviction or acquittal under any one shall bar a prosecution for the same act or omission under any other provision. (Code 1923, § 5204; Code 1940, T. 15, § 287.)"”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"As we see it, the established test to which a plea of former jeopardy must be subjected is, whether the facts averred in the second indictment, if found to be true, would have warranted a conviction upon the first indictment. In other words, in determining whether both indictments charge the same offense, the test generally applied is that when the facts necessary to convict on the second prosecution would necessarily have convicted on the first, a final judgment on the first prosecution will be a bar to the second; but if the facts which will convict on the second prosecution would not be sufficient to convict on the first, then the first will not be a bar to the second."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"A single crime cannot be split up, or divided, into two or more offenses. Hurst v. State , 86 Ala. 604 , 6 So. 120 . Neither can a series of charges be based upon the same act. Gunter v. State , 111 Ala. 23 , 20 So. 632 ; Clayborne v. State , 103 Ala. 53 , 15 So. 842 ; Crosswhite v. State , 31 Ala. App. 181 , 13 So.2d 693 ."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.