¶1Appellant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Mobile County of robbery and sentenced to fifteen years in the penitentiary.
¶2The evidence showed that Charles. Danzy, while riding in his automobile in Prichard, gave two hitchhikers a ride on the night of November 1, 1968. Moments after picking them up they assaulted him and took control of his automobile. He was then taken to a place in Mobile County described as “down here at the L. & N. Railroad tracks” where the two men bound his hands behind him and beat him. The two men took his wallet containing approximately $30.00 in cash and a check for $255.00 and left in Danzy’s automobile.
¶3Later that night the Bay Minette police stopped appellant for reckless driving. When the police asked for his identification he produced Danzy’s wallet and driver’s license. The police became suspicious when the description on the driver’s license did not match that of appellant. When the police arrived at the police station with appellant, they learned that the automobile belonged to Danzy and that he had been robbed.
¶4At the conclusion of the State’s case, appellant made a motion to exclude the evidence. This motion was denied by the trial judge and appellant rested without offering any evidence.
¶5The only issue presented on appeal is the sufficiency of evidence. During the trial Danzy testified that appellant appeared to be the man who robbed him. It is argued in brief that there was no positive identifi*501cation and consequently the verdict of guilt was based on suspicion only. The evidence •was undisputed that appellant was arrested while driving Danzy’s automobile and in possession of his wallet within three or four hours after the robbery. The fact that the victim did not make a positive identification is not fatal. Such fact went to the weight of the testimony. Carpenter v. State, 42 Ala.App. 618, 174 So.2d 336. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.
¶6The judgment appealed from is therefore due to be affirmed.
¶7Affirmed.