Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 Ala. App. 681 - Daly v. State

47 Ala. App. 681 - Daly v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 1991

18 state decisions

120197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Elrod v. State · 42 Ala. App. 314 - Douglas v. State · 21 Ala. App. 234 - Jones v. State · Meadows v. State · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The appellant insists that the case should be reversed because of the failure of the state to prove venue. This is a matter which may be proven by circumstantial evidence and there is some evidence in the record tending to prove the location in Limestone County, Alabama, but aside from this the matter was not called to the court’s attention before argument by a request for the affirmative charge based on this failure by the state to prove venue. This matter cannot be raised for the first time by a motion for a new trial or an appeal. Rule 35, Circuit and Inferior Court Rules, Tit. 7, Appendix, Code of Alabama, 1940, as recompiled 1958; Richardson v. State, 39 Ala.App. 207 , 98 So.2d 59 , cert. denied, 266 Ala. 699 , 98 So.2d 65 ; Payne v. State, 40 Ala. App. 493 , 115 So.2d 670 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.