Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 Ala. App. 699 - Minniefield v. State

47 Ala. App. 699 - Minniefield v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
November 1991
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently November 1991 · most notably 159 W. Va. 805 - State Ex Rel. Partain v. Oakley (1976), Moore v. State (1980)

38 state decisions

220197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Avery v. State of Alabama · Seibold v. State · Lokos v. State · Burns v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Ordinarily counsel who supplants or supplements other counsel, who have already had ample time to get ready for trial, should not expect or ask for a continuance.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * The legislature has not given a right to a defendant to receive a mental examination whenever he requests one. Absent such a right, machinery for screening requests must exist. The legislature has made the trial court this screening agent. We cannot say under our past cases that the appellant’s showing was so compelling that the trial court abused its discretion in denying this petition. The trial court held a hearing, listened to the witnesses and made a decision. It might have decided either way on the question of whether the hearing produced any real evidence of legal insanity or legal incompetence. Its decision was not arbitrary or unsupported by reason or fact. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “At all events we are bound by the opinions of the Supreme Court of Alabama even on Federal questions unless the Supreme Court of the United States expressly or by necessary implication has ruled to the contrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.