Carr v. Frohmiller’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2010 · most notably Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health Services (1989), Anderson v. Lamm (1978)
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co. · Abramson v. Hard · Sellers v. Frohmiller · State v. Ah Sam · Nunez v. Borden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“real, serious fundamental objection to the Legislature's levying and collecting taxes for a specific object and purpose and then prohibiting its expenditure for that purpose and letting it revert to the general fund.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The court is often not controlled by the literal language of the statute, but by its meaning when properly interpreted, though outside of such literal meaning.” 47 Ariz., at 438 , 56 P.2d, at 647 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.