Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 ARK 235 - Criscoe v. Hambrick

Criscoe v. Hambrick’s Empirical Analysis

1886

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
January 1999
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 1999

2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

60188618901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““So far as the record discloses, the lands are held adversely to him; he is excluded from any participation in the rents and profits; and his title is in dispute. He must therefore resort to ejectment to establish his title, as an action for partition is maintainable only by a party in possession, or whose title is admitted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.