Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 ARKAPP 1 - Cagle v. State

Cagle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Butler v. State · Hoffman v. Hoffman · Owen v. State · Dees v. State · Rischar v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion for a continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. The motion should be granted only upon a showing of good cause and only for so long as is necessary, taking into consideration not only the request or consent of counsel, but also the public interest in prompt disposition of the case. The trial court’s action will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion amounting to a denial of justice. The burden is on the appellant to establish both prejudice and an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.