Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 Ark. App. 92 - Beasley v. State

47 Ark. App. 92 - Beasley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · United States v. Dixon · Grady v. Corbin · Chicago Co v. Industrial Commission of Illinois · Hall v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In both the multiple punishment and multiple prosecution contexts, this Court has concluded that where the two offenses for which the defendant is punished or tried cannot survive the “same-elements” test, the double jeopardy bar applies. The same-elements test, sometimes referred to as the “Blockburger” test, inquires whether each offense contains an element not contained in the other; if not, they are the “same offence” and double jeopardy bars additional punishment and successive prosecution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.