Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 CAL 52 - Serrano v. Rawson

Serrano v. Rawson’s Empirical Analysis

1873

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
February 1919
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1919

7 state decisions

4018731880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vance v. Fore · More v. Garcia · Piercy v. Crandall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining the location, the plat of the survey, which is a part of the patent, is often entitled to as much, and perhaps to more, weight than the courses and distances. (Vance v. Fore, 24 Cal. 435 .) In all cases of conflicting descriptions, the object of the court is to ascertain the intention of the parties, and the entire description contained in the instrument should be resorted to for the purpose of ascertaining the intention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.