Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 CAL 536 - Green v. Swift

Green v. Swift’s Empirical Analysis

1874

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
5
states following
January 1970
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 1970

20 state decisions

8018741880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““They [tlie commissioners] were to exercise their judgment honestly, and lo do the work, of course, with proper care and caution, and' not maliciously, oppressively, or arbitrarily, to the injury of the rights of other persons. But. keeping within the scope of these powers, they are not to be held liable for mere errors of judgment, nor for injuries to others resulting from the work itself, if properly performed and with due care. Otherwise, as remarked by Lord Kenyon, every statute of this character ‘would give rise to an Infinity of actions,’ ” citing Governor, etc., v. Meredith, 4 Term R. 796.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.