In Re Florance’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 1992 · most notably 51 Cal. 2d 177 - In Re Petersen (1958), 12 Cal. 3d 434 - Leroy T. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board (1974)
1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 19 Cal. 2d 488 - In Re Bell · In Re Daedler · 81 Cal. App. 2d 205 - In Re Dargo · In Re Jones · Ex parte Stephen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state, represented by the juvenile court and the probation officer, stands in loco parentis to the minor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. Honig G
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.