Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 CAL2D 852 - Wilson v. Beville

Wilson v. Beville’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

68 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably 17 Cal. 3d 129 - Birkenfeld v. City of Berkeley (1976), 1 Cal. 3d 56 - Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969)

68 state decisions

2201957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rose v. State of California · Farrell v. County of Placer · Ex Parte Daniels · 20 Cal. 2d 366 - Pipoly v. Benson · 30 Cal. 2d 746 - Heimann v. City of Los Angeles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the Legislature has adopted statutes governing a particular subject matter, its intent with regard to occupying the field to the exclusion of all local regulation is not to be measured alone by the language used but by the whole purpose and scope of the legislative scheme.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “].) "If the city may enact such legislation or charter provisions the land owner is denied equal protection of the laws for the state statute would fix the limitation where the condemnor was a public utility but a different one would prevail where the condemnor was a municipal corporation. There is no distinction between such condemnors. The city along with public utilities are made equally liable by the Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there is any conflict between charter provisions and the compensation sections of the Labor Code, the latter must prevail. Under power expressly granted to it by the Constitution, the Legislature has established a complete system of workmen's compensation which obviously is a subject of state-wide concern, and it is well settled that in such matters the general law is paramount”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.